the theme of "farmers in the second annual urbanization

Tsinghua expert: since the reform and opening up the government 90% expropriation behavior unconstitutional 2011 05 06:34 on June 6
Source: financial nets author: ZhuYu name T36079 participation: T | print forwarding. The comment 5.4


Tsinghua university CaiJiMing, director of the center for political and economic studies

【 caijing nets "reporter ZhuYu 】" now land system so that the local government have 200% enthusiasm to low-cost collection of farmers' land, high. Government will sell the next ten government land use and transfer rights have taken away."

May 5, the theme of "farmers in the second annual urbanization" independent BBS on urban and rural development, tsinghua university, director of the center for political and economic studies CaiJiMing puts forward, China's current land system must be changed. Land system and blindly quashing food-price food policy so that the local government and farmers have lost the enthusiasm of farmland protection.

He says if the constitution as dynamicDiscount MBT Shoes understanding, government collection of farmers' land basis of city planning, as long as the only listed in the urban planning, the government will use administrative power of rural land is expropriated. But the constitution also provides that the state for public interests needs, can collect farmers' land, and compensation. MBT Kipimo clog So both appear antinomy, countries in the industrialization and urbanization is not out of public interest in land belongs to the illegal.

He thinks, in fact "reform and opening 30 years, imposed on peasants of the land used for public interests, 90% of 10%" but land expropriation and actions violated the constitution.

CaiJiMing pointed out that when industrialization and urbanization mbt sandals clearance in the public interests as the use of land, to collection of farmers means of urban land cannot execute a single state ownership, but should allow realize multiple ownership, including state-owned, collective all and the private sector. And in doing so will not violates the constitution.

"The real right law of private property right are protected, small property is still collective property rights, how can be protected? Villages transformation is possible, but why must to transform it into land state-owned?" He thinks, it is now a small property right, villages are not violate the constitution, the law on land administration, is contradict the next class method and relevant.